The Measure
Spatial coverage of freshwater harmful algal blooms (HABs) in select waterbodies in the Delta is reduced.
-
Expectations
Spatial coverage of freshwater harmful algal blooms (HABs) in select waterbodies in the Delta is reduced.
-
Performance Metrics
- Spatial coverage (acres) of Microcystis sp. cell concentration equivalents (cells/ml), in Delta waterbodies large enough to use the State Water Resources Control Board mapping tool
Cyanobacterial Harmful Algal Blooms (CHABs) from Satellite Monitoring
The visualization below shows the total number of days a specific waterbody meets or exceeds the World Health Organization Level 1 Threshold (threshold) between 2020-2025 in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. The data used in this visualization is from the “HAB Satellite Analysis Tool” (Tool) provided by the California State Water Board Freshwater Harmful Algal Bloom Program. A waterbody that exceeds the threshold does not necessarily mean that a CHAB is present. However, it does provides a screening level analysis for field verification and to confirm the presence of a suspected CHAB. The methods are further discussed below in the tab titled "Data Sources, Collection, and Processing".
Due to the limitations of satellite monitoring (e.g., resolution), it is important to review the disclaimers and other details regarding the tool and can be found on the Harmful Algal Blooms Analysis Tool.
Next data update: Visualizations will be updated shortly after the end of the calendar year.
CHAB Tools and Science and Monitoring Activities
Due to the limitation of satellite monitoring as discussed previously, several other tools and science activities help provide a fuller picture of the status of CHABs in the Delta. Some of these activities' products may help with future indicators or visualizations for this performance measure.
Below are links to CHAB tools and science and monitoring activities:
- CHABs Incident Reporting: HAB Reports Map | Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs)
- CHAB Science Activities: Science activities | Science Tracker
- South Delta CHAB monitoring: Data Portal - Data Package Summary | Environmental Data Initiative (EDI)
CHAB Strategy for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
A Cyanobacteria Harmful Algal Blooms Monitoring Strategy for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (strategy) was released in 2024 with objectives to:
- Establish a monitoring program for Cyanobacterial HABs in the Delta,
- coordinate the collection of priority data,
- promote data-sharing, and
- identify feasible mitigation techniques for reducing HAB prevalence.
The strategy includes several goals, objectives, and recommendations as well as near-term and long-term implementation.
The ongoing activities that stem from this strategy will continually be tracked and highlighted for this performance measure. An established monitoring program for the Delta will be key to performance measures tracking and evaluating the status of HABs in the Delta.
Algae are natural components of marine and freshwater ecosystems and form the foundation of most aquatic food chains. However, when blue-green algae, also known as Cyanobacteria, is present during an algae bloom event, it has the potential to be harmful to humans and wildlife (hence Harmful Algal bloom, HABs). Blue-green algae is often confused with green algae because both may produce dense mats, reduce oxygen levels, affect odor, and/or impede recreation; however green algae generally do not produce toxins. Blue green algae or cyanobacteria on the other hand, has the potential to produce harmful toxins (cyanotoxins). An overview of cyanotoxins and it's different species can be found on the Environmental Protection Agency's website.
HAB events occur naturally due to environmental factors such as nutrient levels, water flow and chemistry, algal species composition, temperature, and sunlight but may be exacerbated due to human activities such as increased nutrient pollution, invasive species, and reduced water flows. Climate change may also be contributing to the increase in HAB events. This is especially important in California and the Delta due to the effects of climate change which includes prolonged droughts and warmer average temperatures.
Monitoring harmful algal blooms in the Delta will assist in the evaluation of risk to human and aquatic health, as well as provide better understanding of connections and factors promoting or maintaining harmful algal blooms.
On September 2019, AB834 -- Freshwater and Estuarine Harmful Algal Bloom Program was passed.
In summary, the bill requires the State Water Resources Control Board (state board) to:
- Establish a Freshwater and Estuarine Harmful Algal Bloom Program to protect water quality and public health from harmful algal blooms.
- Coordinate immediate and long-term algal bloom event incident response,
- Conduct and support algal bloom field assessment and ambient monitoring at State, watershed, and site specific waterbody scales,
- Post information on or before July 1, 2021 on their website regarding algal bloom incidents and responses, among other things, in the state during the previous 3 years.
- Authorize the state board, if it determines an algal bloom event is an emergency, as defined, to enter into contracts to aid in incident response without meeting the conditions prescribed for personal services contracts under the State Civil Service Act, including the requirement for a competitive bidding process, or any other competitive bidding requirements under existing law.
Full text of AB834 can be found at legislature.ca.gov.
Each chapter of the Delta plan includes strategies to achieve the goals of the plan. These strategies are general guidance on achieving the objective laid out in the plan and in the Delta Reform Act of 2009. Associated with these strategies are recommendations. The recommendations describe more specific and implementable actions to support the achievement of Delta Plan strategies. Strategies and recommendations may also have associated performance measures. Delta Plan performance measures track progress in achieving desired outcomes for the Delta Plan. Below are the strategies and recommendations associated with this performance measure.
Delta Plan Strategy
- Improve environmental water quality
- Require Delta-Specific water quality protection
Delta Plan Recommendations
- Protect beneficial uses
- Identify Covered Action impact
- Special water quality protections for the Delta
- Completion of regulatory processes, research, and monitoring for water quality improvements
- Implement Delta Regional Monitoring Program
- Evaluate wastewater recycling, reuse, or treatment
- Manage dissolved oxygen in Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel
- Manage dissolved oxygen in Suisun Marsh
Metric
Spatial coverage (acres) of Microcystis sp. cell concentration equivalents (cells/ml) **, in Delta waterbodies large enough to use the State Water Resources Control Board mapping tool (e.g., Discovery Bay; South Delta along Grantline Canal and Old River surrounding Fabian Tract; Big Break Regional Shoreline; and San Joaquin River between Antioch and Stockton) with densities of 100,000 cell/ml or greater, evaluated annually.
Baseline
Spatial coverage (acres) based on satellite images during the period of 2016–2017
Target
Target to be achieved by 2034:
- Zero acres of waterbodies with densities of 100,000 cells/ml
**The current performance metric tracking Microcystis was based on the measurements of the HABs Analysis Tool during development. During the later stages of development of the HABs Tool, it was concluded that tracking cyanobacteria would be more accurate instead of specifically tracking Microcystis as high densities of cyanobacteria does not mean a Microcystis specific bloom is present. Thus, the metric used in the visualizations above and the tracking of this performance will be the 100,000 cells/ml of cyanobacteria, which is equivalent to 15.8 Modified CyanoIndex of the HABs Analysis Tool.
HABs Satellite Analysis Tool
Data were retrieved from the FHAB Satellite Analysis Tool website. Data downloaded for specific waterbodies captured by the tool within the legal Delta.
The data used in the visualization is calculated based on the tool's “Modified CyanoIndex” (CI), which is a value the tool uses to improve readability and normalization of values. Specifically, a waterbody exceeding the threshold of 36.3 CI or 12.10 (μg/L) of Chlorophyll-a for a given day is counted towards the total. This threshold is equivalent to the World Health Organization Level 1 Threshold. A waterbody meeting or exceeding this threshold may lead to short-term adverse health outcomes (e.g., skin irritations, gastrointestinal illness) and may have further potential to worsen. A 7-day maximum is used as per the tool's recommendation.
"For general evaluations and assessing trends, 7-day composites are generally considered more reliable and easier to assess trends since they avoid large shifts in values where there are days with clouds or other interference that result in invalid data."
In addition, the calculated threshold is much higher than what is targeted in this performance measure (equivalent to a 15.8 CI), however due to a recent study on Forecasting FHABs for Sentinel-3 Satellites by Schaeffer et al. 2024, anything at or above the 36.3 CI or 12.10 (μg/L) of Chlorophyll-a threshold have a higher "prediction accuracy" and anything below the threshold is lower. Due to this finding, the performance measure will use the same threshold as used in the FHAB tool when evaluating satellite data.