The Measure
Water management agencies comply with State Water Resources Control Board objectives for salinity in the Delta for D-1641 and US Fish and Wildlife's 2008 Biological Opinion for X2 action.
-
Expectations
Water management agencies comply with State Water Resources Control Board objectives for salinity in the Delta for D-1641 and X2 action.
-
Performance Metrics
- Monthly electrical conductivity (EC), water temperature, and X2 action in the Delta, evaluated annually.
Delta Salinity Compliance
Below is a map visualization of Delta salinity compliance in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. The compliance rates are based on if each stations' salinity objectives for agricultural and/or ecosystem objectives were met. The targets for this performance measure are to meet SWRCB's D-1641 salinity objectives at least 99 percent of the time at compliance points.
Salinity objectives and duration can change depending on the water year. For additional information, please view: D-1641 salinity objectives.
Toggle between the points (left) to display salinity compliance for that station (right). For a more detailed guide, press the top right icon (three lined icon).
Note about the data: Some stations do not have data or did not have compliance values for a specific water year and will appear as blank or at zero percent. (E.g. Station WCI, SNC). Compliance reports of D-1641 salinity objectives can be viewed at the State Water Board's website. Suisun Marsh Salinity reports can be found on the California Natural Resource Agency data portal.
Next Data Update: The data below will be regularly updated soon after the beginning of the water year.
Salinity in the Delta is an important water quality characteristic affecting municipal, industrial, agricultural, and fish and wildlife water uses. Changes in Delta salinity have far-reaching impacts, from affecting water supply for farmers in the Central Valley to the wildlife and ecosystems of the San Francisco Bay. When salinity exceeds compliance conditions or changes too rapidly, it can have negative impacts on many beneficial uses of water. This includes altered water taste and availability, crop damage and loss, and limitations for recharging groundwater.
The Delta is a transition zone between freshwater and saltwater, serving as an important habitat for hundreds of native terrestrial and aquatic organisms. The amount of freshwater flowing into and through the Delta drives seasonal and annual salinity levels.
Both natural and man-made actions affect salinity in the Delta and Suisun Marsh. Tidal forces, agricultural run-off, exports, and freshwater inflow from the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers jointly influence salinity levels of the Delta. The management of salinity is governed by the Department of Water Resources (DWR) and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) due to their roles in managing reservoirs in the watershed and water exports in the Delta. Since DWR and USBR are water right holders for the State Water Project and Central Valley Project, respectively, they must comply with State Water Board Decision 1641 requirements which help protect water quality in the Delta by setting flow and salinity objectives.
The X2 action is designed specifically to protect the aquatic life of the Delta estuary. X2 is a physical attribute of the estuary used as a habitat indicator for the location of the low salinity zone. X2 is the location in kilometers from the Golden Gate Bridge where water salinity is 2 ppt (parts per thousand) of isohaline salt. The low salinity zone is where freshwater transitions into brackish water. Historically, the low salinity zone was associated with high primary productivity, zooplankton population, and abundance of native species.

2024 Biological Opinion (BiOps)
In 2024, the USFWS released an updated Biological Opinion (BiOps) on the operation of the CVP and SWP. The 2024 BiOps carries over similar requirements as the 2019 BiOps for the X2 action, requiring the California Department of Water Resources and the Bureau of Reclamation to maintain an average of 80 km or less from the Golden Gate in “above normal” and "wet” years for September through October. It also included other measures, such as the operation of the Suisun Marsh Salinity Control Gates and fish food enhancement actions, that are expected to achieve ecological benefits. Prior to the 2019 BiOps, the X2 action target was at 80 km or less following above-normal years and 74 km or less for wet years in September and October.
CDFW Incidental Take Permit (ITP)
In November 2024, CDFW issued an updated ITP to the Department of Water Resources for long-term operations of the State Water Project. The ITP covers four protected species under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA): Delta Smelt, Longfin Smelt, Winter-run Chinook Salmon, and Spring-run Chinook Salmon. It may also include a fifth species, White Sturgeon, and is currently designated as a candidate to be covered under the ITP but is awaiting final designation to be included under the CESA by the Fish and Game Commission. The ITP authorization will expire on November 1, 2034, unless renewed.
Water Year 2025
In 2025, the Department of Water Resources (DWR) requested a permit amendment that modified the X2 action for Water Year 2025. The modified X2 action for Water Year 2025 adheres to the following minimum requirements:
- Permittee shall operate to meet the requirements of D-1641 in September 2025 and October 2025 and is not required to meet a monthly average X2 of ≤ 80 km during this time.
- Permittee shall operate the Suisun Marsh Salinity Control Gates (SMSCG) for 60 days as required for an above normal water year type. In addition, Permittee shall extend the required SMSCG operations for three (3) consecutive days starting from August 23, 2025, and operate the SMSCG on a daily basis starting from September 5, 2025, for an additional seven (7) consecutive days to expand the spatial extent of Delta Smelt low salinity zone habitat in Suisun Marsh.
Additional details regarding the amendment can be found here: Major Amendment to California Endangered Species Act Incidental Permit No. 2081-2023-054-00 (ITP).
Each chapter of the Delta plan includes strategies to achieve the goals of the plan. These strategies are general guidance on achieving the objective laid out in the plan and in the Delta Reform Act of 2009. Associated with these strategies are recommendations. The recommendations describe more specific and implementable actions to support the achievement of Delta Plan strategies. Strategies and recommendations may also have associated performance measures. Delta Plan performance measures track progress in achieving desired outcomes for the Delta Plan. Below are the strategies and recommendations associated with this performance measure.
Delta Plan Strategy
- Protect beneficial uses by managing salinity
Delta Plan Recommendations
- Refer to Chapter 4's functional flows recommendations
Metric
Monthly electrical conductivity, water temperature, and X2 in the Delta and Suisun Marsh, evaluated annually.
Baseline
Average monthly electrical conductivity, water temperature, and X2 at SWRCB compliance points from 1995 to 2015.
Target
- Water management agencies meet SWRCB salinity objectives for ecosystem purposes at least 99 percent of the time at compliance points
- Water management agencies meet all other SWRCB salinity objectives for urban and agricultural beneficial use at least 99 percent of the time at compliance points
- Water management agencies maintain average X2 for September and October at or less than 74 km in the fall following wet years and at or less than 81 km in the fall following above normal years. The monthly average X2 must be maintained at or seaward of these values for each individual month and not averaged over the two-month period.
Methods
- Delta Compliance reports are available from DWR. These reports point out which stations went over the compliance value and for how long.
- The specific locations and objectives are located in SWRCB's Water Quality Control Plan Appendix K
- Salinity measurements can also be viewed at DWR's CDEC.
X2 Action - Archived details:
2024 (Above Normal Water Year)
- In September 2024, CDFW issued a minor amendment to the ITP, which affected the X2 average for October. The amendment allowed an alternative implementation to operate to a monthly average X2 of 80 km in September 2024 and operate the Suisun Marsh Salinity Control Gates (SMSCG) daily from September 6 – September 30, 2024. Additionally, in October 2024 the monthly average X2 of 80 km is not required. The operation of the SMSCG on a daily basis from September 6 – 30, 2024 is expected to provide improved habitat conditions for DS in September 2024 beyond what would have been provided by operating in September to a monthly average X2 of 80 km in the absence of SMSCG operations.
2023 (Wet Year): USFWS 2019 BiOp and CDFW 2020 ITP requirements in effect.
2019 (Wet Year): USFWS 2019 BiOp requirements in effect.
2017 (Wet Year)
- From the USFWS memo: Relaxed targets of the 2008 BiOPs were approved by US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). U.S. Bureau of Reclamation operated its facilities to achieve an average X2 distance of no greater than 80 km instead of the 74 km for October 2017.
- From the CDFW memo: California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) determined that the change to the implementation of the fall X2 Action in October 2017 was not consistent with the California Endangered Species Act. The Department of Water Resources committed to keep X2 at 79 km monthly average for October to significantly minimize any short-term habitat effects to Delta smelt.
2011 (Wet Year): USFWS 2008 BiOp requirements in effect.
Data Sources
Delta Compliance
Water Quality Control Plan Appendix K
California Data Exchange Center
Synthesis of studies in the fall low-salinity zone of the San Francisco estuary
Advancement of Salinity and Flow Monitoring in the San Francisco Bay Delta.
Isohaline Position as a Habitat Indicator for Estuarine Populations.
An Updated Conceptual Model of Delta Smelt Biology: Our Evolving Understanding of an Estuarine Fish.
A Synthesis of Delta Smelt Habitat in the Upper San Francisco
Identifying minimum freshwater habitat conditions for an endangered fish using life cycle analysis